RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the color stability of smart monochromatic composite resin after coloring with coffee solution, thermal aging and brushing with four different kinds of toothpaste. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the manufacturer's instructions, 40 smart monochromatic composite resin (Omnichroma, Tokuyama Dental, Japan) specimens were prepared with a thickness of 2 mm and a diameter of 10 mm. The samples were divided into four groups. The first group (SFM) was brushed with Sensodyne Fresh Mint (Sensodyne GSK, UK), the second group (CW) with Colgate 2 in 1 Whitening (Colgate Palmolive, USA), the third group (OW) with Opalescence Whitening (Ultradent Products, Inc., USA), the fourth group (COW) with Colgate Optic White With Charcoal (Colgate Palmolive, USA). At time point t0, no brushing and thermal cycles were performed. For time point t1, simulations corresponding to 10 days of staining, thermal aging and brushing were performed. For time point t2, simulations corresponding to one year of staining, thermal aging and brushing were performed. The color of all specimens was measured at t0, t1 and t2 with a spectrophotometer. To examine the color change, ΔE00 values were calculated with the CIEDE 2000 color system. Shapiro Wilk, Kolmogorov Smirnov, Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: According to the results of the intergroup comparison, there is no statistically significant difference between the groups in ΔE00(t0-t1) values in terms of t0-t1 time period measurement (p>0.05). There is a statistically significant difference between the groups in ΔE00(t1-t2)values in terms of t1-t2 time period measurement (p<0.05). The COW group had the lowest ΔE00(t1-t2) value and the OW group had the highest ΔE00(t1-t2) value. There is a statistically significant difference between the groups in ΔE00 (t0-t2) values in terms of t0-t2 time period measurement (p<0.05). The COW group had the lowest ΔE00(t0-t2) value and the OW group had the highest ΔE00(t0-t2) value. CONCLUSION: The whitening efficacy of different kinds of toothpaste whitening mechanisms may differ from each other. Toothpastes also show whitening on composite resins. The lowest discoloration was observed in the group brushed with toothpaste containing activated charcoal and blue covarine. The efficacy of whitening toothpastes should be supported by in vivo studies.
RESUMO
AIM: The aim of the present study is to compare the repair bond strengths (RBSs) of Cention-N (light-cure and self-cure modes), Equia Forte HT Fil and a nanohybrid resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Equia Forte HT Fil (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Cention-N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and Filtek Z550 (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) were used in this study. Equia Forte HT Fil (EQF), Cention-N self-cure (CSC), Cention-N light-cure (CLC) and Filtek Z550 (Z550) groups were formed. A total of 40 samples were prepared; 10 samples in each group (n = 10). After the polymerization was completed according to the manufacturer's instructions, the samples were polished with OptiDisc (Kerr Corporation, Orange, USA) for 5 s each, from extra-course to extra-fine. After all samples were stored in 37°C water for 24 h, 10,000 cycles of brushing simulator and thermal cycles were applied to the samples. The samples were prepared in accordance with the selected repair protocol, and microshear bond strength (µSBS) test was performed. Fracture analysis on debonded surfaces was visualized by scanning electron microscopy. The conformity of the data to normal distribution was analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Multiple comparisons were performed using Dunn's test. RESULTS: Z550 showed significantly higher µSBS as compared to the other three groups. There is no difference between CSC, CLC and EQF. CONCLUSION: The use of Cention-N's self-cure or light-cure mode did not affect the RBS values. The RBS values of Cention-N and Equia Forte HT Fil materials are lower than those of the composite resin material.
